Wattency is a YMYL platform. Projects listed here are evaluated by investors and power buyers who rely on accuracy and completeness. Our vetting process is designed to ensure only projects with a credible, documentable basis reach the marketplace stage.
Step 1 — Initial submission and completeness check
Project developers submit structured project details through the Wattency project creation workflow. Before any further review, the submission is assessed for completeness across:
- Project type, capacity, and location details.
- Technical specifications: installed capacity (kW), expected generation (kWh/yr), and CUF assumptions.
- Financial information: investment required, pricing structure, and expected return parameters.
- Timeline: estimated commissioning date and project milestones.
Incomplete submissions are returned to the developer with a clear description of missing items before any substantive review begins.
Step 2 — Verification of basic claims
Platform administrators review the submitted data against reasonability benchmarks:
- CUF assumptions are cross-checked against typical range for the stated project type and location.
- Expected generation figures are reviewed against capacity and CUF consistency.
- Investment requirements are checked for rough market-rate alignment with project type and scale.
- Developer credentials and company details are reviewed for completeness.
Projects with assumptions that are materially inconsistent with established benchmarks are flagged for revision or rejection with feedback provided.
Step 3 — Technical review
For projects progressing through the approval queue, a technical review is conducted covering:
- System design coherence: capacity, technology choice, and location irradiance alignment.
- Equipment specification review where provided (module model, inverter, mounting type).
- Grid connectivity and interconnection status or plan.
- Site access and land arrangement context.
This step is conducted with reference to Mecpower Solutions Limited's domain expertise in solar PV and hybrid projects.
Step 4 — Legal and regulatory clearance check
Regulatory and legal context is reviewed for:
- Applicable permits, approvals, and statutory clearances relevant to the project type and state.
- PPA or offtake agreement structure where applicable.
- Compliance context for ALMM requirements where the project falls under government scheme eligibility.
- Developer's track record and any known history relevant to delivery credibility.
Platform review is not a substitute for investor-side independent legal due diligence. Investors are encouraged to conduct their own review before committing.
Step 5 — Governance and admin approval
Following completion of the above steps, a designated platform administrator approves or rejects the listing:
- Approved projects become visible on the marketplace with their reviewed data.
- Rejected projects receive structured feedback to support resubmission with corrections.
- Projects in a pending state remain invisible to marketplace participants.
What vetting does not replace
Wattency's vetting process establishes a structured minimum review standard for marketplace listing. It does not replace:
- Independent legal due diligence on project documents and contracts.
- Third-party technical audit reports for investor-grade diligence.
- Financial advisory for investment suitability.
Investors should undertake their own review proportionate to their investment size and risk profile. Use the
investment guide as a starting checklist.