Money, Space, or Both? Choose the Right Solar Model

This practical guide helps you choose the right path to lower energy costs based on what you already have: capital, rooftop/land space, or both.

Share this guide: LinkedIn X WhatsApp

Scenario 1: You have money and space

If you have both capital and usable space (rooftop/land), you can move toward an ownership-led setup and use Wattency to structure execution and commercial pathways.

  • Post your requirement on Wattency and share your load and site profile.
  • Evaluate project structuring options and execution support models.
  • Choose the path that balances control, timeline, and expected savings.

Scenario 2: You have space but limited upfront capital

If your site is suitable but capex is constrained, a PPA/RESCO-style structure can help you adopt solar without major upfront investment.

  • Submit demand profile, location, and timeline via the buyer flow.
  • Use contract-led procurement to align project setup and commercial terms.
  • Pay for energy delivered under agreed terms, typically at a lower effective unit rate than conventional alternatives, subject to contract and regulations.

Scenario 3: You have money but no usable space

This is common for many businesses and individuals. If you have investable capital but no rooftop/land, you can participate through solar investment opportunities on Wattency.

  • Define your investment profile, expected return range, and timeline.
  • Review opportunities and allocate capital based on risk/tenure fit.
  • Use project cashflow outcomes (subject to project terms and performance) to offset net energy economics over time.

How to choose in 5 minutes

Your Constraint Recommended Path Primary Benefit
Money + space Ownership-led or structured setup through Wattency buyer/project flow Higher control and direct asset participation
Space, no upfront capital PPA/RESCO-style procurement through Switch to Clean Energy flow Low upfront commitment with contract-led power pricing
Money, no space Solar investment participation through Start Investing flow Capital deployment without site dependency

Note: Commercial outcomes depend on project structure, performance, counterparty terms, and applicable regulations.

Frequently asked questions

A common case is having capital but limited usable space, where investment participation can be evaluated as an alternative path.

Yes, space-first models such as PPA/RESCO-style structures are designed to reduce upfront capital burden, subject to project qualification and commercial terms.

No. Expected outcomes depend on project performance, commercial contracts, and regulatory context. Always evaluate disclosures and terms before commitment.